Summary
A maker's newsroom article on hearing loss and inclusion that sets out its view of the limits of loops, infrared and FM and promotes its Wi-Fi streaming system.
Key findings
- Calls induction loops, infrared and FM the three traditional methods and says all have serious limitations, "starting with limited range".
- States that "Infrared systems take a lot of time and resources to implement and properly maintain the hardware", that loop infrastructure needs expensive, labour-intensive installation and limits hardware to one seating area, and that FM signals are "unsafe and can be easily interfered with".
- Says special seating areas for people with hearing loss create social stigma, and that "shared assistive listening devices pose a major hygiene and health risk" in the COVID-19 era and after.
- Presents its MobileConnect system, which streams over Wi-Fi to listeners' own phones in place of rental devices, and notes that Bluetooth to hearing devices can add significant delay.
Limits
Marketing by a maker of a competing Wi-Fi system; its statements about loops, infrared and FM give no data or references.
Read the original
newsroom.sennheiser.com/on-the-current-situation-of-hearing-impaired-people-in-society
Cited in
- Where does infrared assistive listening work, and where does it fall short?Partly answered
- What does each system cost to install and to run over its life?Open
Cite this source
Mros LS (Sennheiser). On the current situation of people with hearing loss in society. Sennheiser newsroom. 20 July 2021. https://newsroom.sennheiser.com/on-the-current-situation-of-hearing-impaired-people-in-society (accessed 9 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.