Summary
Compared extended and restricted bandwidth in fitted hearing aids for 24 adults with high-frequency hearing loss.
Key findings
- Twenty-four participants with mild-to-moderately-severe sloping sensorineural hearing loss used DSL v5.0 fittings with maximum available bandwidth or reduced gain above 4.5 kHz.
- Extended bandwidth yielded an average maximum audible output frequency of 7.5 kHz for a 65 dB SPL input; the abstract reports a 4.1% consonant discrimination improvement, attributed to /s/, /z/ and /t/.
- No significant change in loudness perception or preferred listening level was found. Forty-six percent preferred extended bandwidth and 33% had no preference.
Limits
Only the publisher abstract, author information, acknowledgments and funding statement were readable, through a Wayback Machine copy. The full paper and detailed methods were not read. Hearing-aid bandwidth evidence, not a venue-system or codec comparison.
Read the original
www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14992027.2020.1750718
Cited in
- How good is the sound each system delivers: bandwidth, codecs and speech understanding?Partly answered
Cite this source
Van Eeckhoutte M, Folkeard P, Glista D, Scollie S. Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users. International Journal of Audiology (Taylor & Francis). 20 April 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14992027.2020.1750718 (accessed 13 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.