Summary
A German acoustician's short paper on what hearing loops achieve in reverberant rooms, their physical limits (spill, metal, magnetic interference) and how phased loop arrays address them in cinemas and conference rooms.
Key findings
- Figure 1 on printed page 97 identifies seats 260 and 464 and labels the measure STI-PA. Both loop bars exceed the caption's 0.75 threshold for excellent intelligibility and the other plotted conditions. The surrounding text cites Seidler's 2009 work, listed as reference 2 on page 98; the 2012 paper does not name the room, its country, measurement date or instrument.
- Compares the Speech Transmission Index at two seats in a reverberant room for normal hearing, hearing aids, hearing aids with the sound system, and the loop, and reports a very clear rise to excellent intelligibility with the loop (the chart's scale labels values above 0.75 excellent).
- Explains that the telecoil uses only the vertical component of the loop's field and that, because the loop and the listeners' heads are at different heights, the signal is about equally strong near the cable and in the middle of the room.
- Names three limits: a field that spreads about three loop widths outside the loop into neighbouring rooms; metal structures that change the field, affecting high frequencies more than low; and interfering magnetic fields from unbalanced electrical installations and poorly suppressed switchgear, which it says planning and correct installation can largely prevent.
- Says phased arrays of two offset, phase-shifted figure-of-eight loops cut the field by about 20 dB at about 1 m outside the covered area, limit vertical spread because the segments are narrow (1-4 m), compensate frequency-dependent metal losses, and let rooms of any shape be covered.
- Notes that in such arrays the horizontal field component along the laying axis is also even, though about 3 dB lower, so hearing aid and implant users whose pickup coil lies horizontally can also use them.
- Says arrays need design by a specialist planner and final measurement to the standard, and that loops built this way work reliably with little maintenance once construction is complete.
Limits
A two-page conference summary: the STI results are shown only as a chart, the room and loop are not described, and the spill and array figures are given without the measurements behind them. The layout figure is credited to a maker's system (Humantechnik/Univox). The reliability statement is the author's view, without data. The conference ran on 19-22 March 2012.
Read the original
pub.dega-akustik.de/DAGA_2012/data/articles/000413.pdf
Cited in
- Where do hearing loops fall short: metal, spill, noise and upkeep?Partly answered
- What works in theatres and cinemas, and what do the rules ask of them?Partly answered
Cite this source
Seidler H. Induktive Höranlagen in Kinos und Kongressräumen (Hearing loops in cinemas and conference rooms). Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA 2012, Darmstadt (German Acoustical Society), pp. 97-98. March 2012. https://pub.dega-akustik.de/DAGA_2012/data/articles/000413.pdf (accessed 13 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.