Summary
A small study comparing a neckloop into a cochlear implant processor's telecoil with a directly connected receiver, for speech understanding in noise.
Key findings
- Nine adolescents and adults used Advanced Bionics Harmony, Cochlear Nucleus 5 or MED-EL OPUS 2 processors (three each) with an Oticon neckloop FM receiver, which feeds the processor's telecoil, and with an Oticon receiver connected directly to the processor.
- Both receivers gave significantly better speech recognition in noise than the implant alone. At the same gain setting, the neckloop gave significantly better speech recognition in noise, and better ratings in some situations, than the direct connection.
- When each receiver's best gain setting was compared, the difference was no longer significant. Output measured through a Nucleus 5 differed between the two receivers at the same setting and matched when the direct receiver's gain was raised.
- The authors attribute the result to the processor's different handling of direct input and telecoil input, and call for a more objective way to fit such systems to implant processors.
Limits
Read from the publisher's abstract only; the full text, including any funding statement, could not be read. Personal FM receivers, not venue systems; nine participants (seven in the second experiment); processors of 2013.
Read the original
www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.3766/jaaa.24.10.5
Cited in
- Are telecoils switched on and set up well enough for loops to work?Not reliable yet
- What reaches a cochlear implant user in a venue, and how well?Partly answered
- Do neckloops give telecoil users good sound from FM, infrared, Wi-Fi and Auracast receivers?Not reliable yet
Cite this source
Schafer EC, Romine D, Musgrave E, Momin S, Huynh C. Electromagnetic versus Electrical Coupling of Personal Frequency Modulation (FM) Receivers to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24(10):927-940. November 2013. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.3766/jaaa.24.10.5 (accessed 9 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.