Summary
Compared listening through a TV streamer, with the implant microphones turned down by 6 dB or muted, against the cochlear implant alone, in quiet and in noise.
Key findings
- Sixteen implant users (15 bilateral) were tested with audiovisual sentences (the Connected Speech Test) in quiet and at +5 dB SNR with a competing message, in three conditions: implant only, streaming with the implant microphones attenuated by 6 dB, and streaming with the microphones muted.
- In noise, speech understanding, clarity ratings and sound quality ratings differed across all three conditions: implant only was poorest, streaming with attenuated microphones better, and streaming with muted microphones best.
- In quiet, understanding and clarity were significantly better with the microphones muted than with the implant only or with attenuated microphones.
- Participants preferred both streaming options to the implant alone in noise, and the muted option in quiet; overall, streaming with attenuated microphones was preferred to the implant alone.
- The authors advise counselling implant users on adjusting the microphone settings when using a TV streamer.
Limits
Read from the abstract only; the abstract does not name the streamer or processors. A personal TV streamer in a laboratory, cited here as evidence about a streamed input and its mix with the processor microphones, not about a venue system. Sixteen participants.
Read the original
doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00204
Cited in
Cite this source
Plyler PN, Wade M, Dimlich A, Hausladen J, Humphrey E. Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Cochlear Implant User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise. American Journal of Audiology 34(2):270-280. 13 March 2025. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00204 (accessed 9 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.