Summary
Compared sentence reception with 4, 6, 8 and 10 kHz bandwidths in spatially separated competing speech.
Key findings
- The bandwidth experiments included 25 adults with symmetric mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss and 24 with normal hearing. Listeners with hearing loss used individually adjusted simulated amplification through insert earphones.
- Increasing bandwidth from 4 to 10 kHz improved the mean sentence reception threshold by 1.3 dB with target and maskers on opposite sides, and 0.5 dB with diffuse masking, for listeners with hearing loss. The effect across conditions was significant.
- Normal-hearing listeners benefited more, with about 3 dB improvement. The authors call for tests with other maskers and reverberation.
Limits
Shared evidence about audible bandwidth, not a venue transmission-system comparison. All recorded talkers were male; hearing-loss and normal-hearing groups used different presentation arrangements. Read the full author manuscript in PMC. The date uses the September-October 2015 journal issue, with month precision.
Read the original
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4549240
Cited in
- How good is the sound each system delivers: bandwidth, codecs and speech understanding?Partly answered
Cite this source
Levy SC, Freed DJ, Nilsson M, Moore BCJ, Puria S. Extended high-frequency bandwidth improves reception of speech in spatially separated masking speech. Ear and Hearing 36(5):e214-e224. September 2015. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4549240/ (accessed 13 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.