Summary
Tested full versus restricted bandwidth through fitted Earlens direct-drive hearing devices in 15 adults.
Key findings
- Fifteen adult hearing aid users with symmetric sensorineural loss wore the devices for 4-15 weeks before outcome testing; full bandwidth provided measurable audibility to 10 kHz, compared with a restricted condition reducing gain above 5 kHz.
- Full bandwidth improved sentence reception in competing speech by 1.1 dB on average across spatial configurations and improved high-frequency consonant recognition and detection.
- Results, Loudness Ratings and Preference: full bandwidth produced a small but perceptible loudness increase. Eight of 15 participants preferred full bandwidth, six had no preference and one preferred restricted bandwidth.
- Real-world acclimatisation used only full bandwidth, which the authors note could influence preferences; preference tests used speech in quiet.
Limits
Manufacturer-funded, small study of one direct-drive hearing device. Shared evidence on the audible bandwidth of a listening path; no venue transmitter or codec was tested. Full PMC text read through the Wayback Machine; supplementary files were not read.
Read the original
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8060758
Cited in
- How good is the sound each system delivers: bandwidth, codecs and speech understanding?Partly answered
Cite this source
Folkeard P, Van Eeckhoutte M, Levy S, Dundas D, Abbasalipour P, Glista D, Agrawal S, Scollie S. Detection, Speech Recognition, Loudness, and Preference Outcomes With a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth. Trends in Hearing 25:2331216521999139. 19 April 2021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8060758/ (accessed 13 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.