Summary
A court intermediary company's account of hearing loops in courts in England and Wales, with a case in which a remote video link made a loop unusable, and its suggestions for intermediaries and courts.
Key findings
- Describes a hearing in which a service user was given loop equipment with headphones. When the prosecution barrister began speaking remotely over the Cloud Video Platform link, the loop produced "a very loud squealing sound"; the service user stopped using it and relied on the intermediary's summaries.
- Says the loop "picks up every sound", from typing to the shuffling of papers, and that this background noise affects how well speech can be heard.
- Cites an anonymous account of a respondent offered an infrared receiver with earbuds, which would have meant removing the hearing aids the respondent depended on.
- Recommends learning about the person's hearing beforehand, avoiding hybrid hearings, trialling the equipment in advance, giving the person a way to signal difficulty and a self-rating scale, reducing background noise and choosing seating that helps lip-reading.
- Its case study describes a party joining remotely making the hearing loop generate considerable feedback, a very loud squealing sound, and it advises avoiding hybrid hearings because remote attendance can cause feedback for loop users.
Limits
A practitioner article with one case described in outline and no measurements; it does not name the court or the equipment, or say how the remote audio was connected to the loop. Its figures on Crown Court loops and its quotation from a judge come from sources recorded separately here.
Read the original
www.communicourt.co.uk/news/hearing-loops-court-proceedings
Cited in
- What works in courtrooms, council chambers and other meeting rooms where speech must be heard by all and kept in the room?Partly answered
Cite this source
Communicourt. Hearing loops in court proceedings: The good, the bad and the squeaky. Communicourt (news). 31 October 2022. https://www.communicourt.co.uk/news/hearing-loops-court-proceedings/ (accessed 9 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.