Summary
Speech intelligibility tests in simulated sound fields and analysis of measured room responses on the role of early reflections.
Key findings
- Adding early reflections, arriving within 50 ms of the direct sound, increased the effective signal-to-noise ratio and intelligibility scores as much as an equal increase in direct-sound energy.
- The benefit held both for younger listeners with near-normal hearing and for older listeners with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss; none of the 21 listeners in the initial tests used hearing aids.
- In measured rooms for speech, early reflections raised the effective signal-to-noise ratio by up to 9 dB, most at seats far from the talker.
- Section II.B.2 divides the 21 participants in the initial tests into 11 with near-normal hearing and 10 with greater hearing loss; the latter needed approximately 5 dB higher SNR for similar intelligibility in this experiment. This is a group result, not a universal target. Separate study funding is not stated in the archived manuscript.
- Section II.B.3 uses a partly different sample of 16 listeners (10 with near-normal hearing and six with greater hearing loss) for the tests with added late reverberation. The initial 21-person sample is not a total for every experiment in the paper.
Limits
Simulated sound fields in an anechoic room; reflections of a single source, not two separate systems carrying the same programme; no listeners with severe hearing loss, which the authors say still needs testing.
Read the original
nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/?id=dd3c1e7a-8d8d-440e-bbcd-04c69ef20419
Cited in
- Should the Auracast stream be delayed to line up with the loudspeakers?Open
- How much do room acoustics and distance limit listening without a system, and what follows for choosing one?Partly answered
Cite this source
Bradley JS, Sato H, Picard M. On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113(6):3233-3244. June 2003. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/?id=dd3c1e7a-8d8d-440e-bbcd-04c69ef20419 (accessed 13 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.