Summary
Measured the delay and frequency response of two proprietary 2.4 GHz remote-microphone systems used with behind-the-ear hearing aids, alone and mixed with the hearing aids' own microphones.
Key findings
- Two remote microphones from different manufacturers, each paired with a hearing aid, were measured in a semi-anechoic test chamber.
- Total delay through remote microphone and hearing aid was about 23-24 ms for one system and 33-35 ms for the other; the hearing aids alone added about 5-7 ms.
- When the remote-microphone signal and the hearing aid's own microphones had similar gain, the combined response showed comb-filter ripples.
- The authors conclude that similar transmission systems do not have the same delay, so any timing alignment has to be set per model and brand.
- Sections 2 and 3.1 describe 5-cycle tone bursts at 750, 1500 and 3000 Hz, at 70 dB SPL, comparing a reference microphone with a measurement microphone in a 2 cc coupler. Two compression settings were used. HA1 alone took about 6-7 ms and HA2 about 5-7 ms; RM1 plus HA1 took about 23-24 ms and RM2 plus HA2 about 33-35 ms.
- The Funding Statement distinguishes no external funding for the research from funding of the article processing charge by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo under project RC 05/21.
- The Funding Statement distinguishes no external research funding from the publication charge paid by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo under project RC 05/21; the author affiliations identify two authors at Acustica Caregnato.
Limits
Two proprietary systems, not Auracast; idealised semi-anechoic conditions; no listener testing.
Read the original
www.mdpi.com/2039-4349/15/5/123
Cited in
- Should the Auracast stream be delayed to line up with the loudspeakers?Open
- What reaches a cochlear implant user in a venue, and how well?Partly answered
Cite this source
Andreatta E, Caregnato I, Selmo A, Gulli A, Onofrei MG, Orzan E. Time delay and frequency analysis of remote microphones. Audiology Research 15(5):123. 25 September 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4349/15/5/123 (accessed 13 October 2026).
Every finding here cites its source, and who funded each source is labelled. This site does not recommend products. Found an error or a missing study? Suggest a correction.